What is abuse? How is it determined
by the normal rules of common sense? and how is it determined by
"experts?"
|
|
Lets say a child is playing
happily with one or both of their parents, and happens to sustain a
bruise in the course of that playing. If the child carries on playing,
has that child suffered abuse at the hands of the parents? Probably
not, if you apply the rules of common sense. If that same child shows
signs of distress at getting the bruise, and refuses to carry on
playing, but instead chides the parents
in the way that children do, has that child now suffered abuse? Again,
you
might expect the answer to be NO, and the child just does not wish to
carry
on with that particular game. However, now we have to apply the
rules
of the "experts" who see abuse and abusers everywhere, and would, given
half
a chance, convince the child that something terrible had been done to
them
by the parents. This sort of attitude leads to false accusations on a
worryingly large scale.
|
|
Imagine a young family, where
the parents have no hang-ups in their attitude towards walking around
their own home undressed, particularly when going from the bathroom to
the bedroom to get dressed. their young child has been used to
this from birth,
and sees nothing wrong in it. At the age of about seven, the child
starts
to giggle when seeing the parents naked, so the parents then decide
that
it is time to no longer carry on walking around naked, but to
cover
up instead. So has this child been subjected to abuse? Applying the
rules
of common sense, they probably have not. Just try to convince the
"experts" of that and see their reaction. They would say the parents
had covered
up because they (the parents)
feel
that they might abuse the
child. The parents would probably say it was
to spare the child's blushes, as you would expect. However, had the
parents
not covered up, the "experts" would then say that abuse had taken place
in the manner of indecency. A no win situation for the parents.
|
|
Take a teenager who decides that
they
no longer want to wash/do chores/go to school, or worse, starts to
steal from the local shop, friends, family members. If the parents tell
the teenager off for bad behaviour, has that teenager been subjected to
abuse. Apply the rules of common sense and decide for yourself. Now
apply the rules of the "experts" and see what you come up with. If the
"expert" answer is:- Well the teen is stealing/skipping school/ being
verbally and physically threatening because he/she has been abused by
his/her parents, then you are
starting to get the idea.
|
|
How many of us, have seen an unhappy
child being dragged around the supermarket by their parents, only to be
smacked, in full view of other shoppers, for demanding sweets,
biscuits, cakes etc, or simply out of sheer frustration at the boredom
of this activity from
their point of view. Could this be considered abuse? Applying the rules
of
common sense, it probably is, and personally that is the stand I take.
I'd
like to take those parents by the scruff of the neck and have a real go
at them. I daren't even contemplate what an "expert" might make of
that!
|
|
What of a child in care? How much
abuse do Social workers
carry out on children under their care? For example, would depriving a
child
of water count as abuse? I think it would, allowing for common sense to
prevail.
But for the "experts", who knows. Does teaching a child to steal, do
drugs,
shoplift etc count as abuse? Now I believe that it is, and, I hear you
say,
no-one would do that anyway, and I hope you are right. However, whilst
I
believe that every loving parent would teach their children NOT to do
these
things, I do not believe that SS has the same interests at heart. After
all,
these are not their children are they? they are just an inconvenience
dropped
on them by society, just another number! It follows then, that if the
SS
do not teach the children in their care the difference between right
and
wrong, then these same children are probably victims of state condoned
abuse
on the largest scale ever seen in the civilized world. How else could
you
describe the training of young thugs, tearaways etc. Worse still, the
inherent dangers in training a child to become a false accuser is a
real risk that the SS seem only to willing to ignore.
|
|
Now don't get me wrong, I am of the
opinion that out
there somewhere is a social worker who really can make a difference,
and
does in fact have the interests of the children he/she helps at the
very
core of their being. Unfortunately, I have been bitten by one of the
thousands
of bad ones. I hope for the sake of the children that I am wrong, but I
fear
that I am not.
|
|
Perhaps the most worrying thing of all
though, is the imminent introduction into British law of the new sexual
offences act. This will do nothing but make thousands more innocent
people into child sex offenders. Buying sweets or gifts for a child
will be seen as a sign of 'grooming' (whatever that is?) Playing with
your children in perfectly innocent pastimes, e.g. tag, pass the
parcel, monopoly etc will be seen as a precursor to sexual abuse. What
are we to do? If a new mother changes her child's nappy, is she going
to be guilty of sexual abuse? What about the grandparent who
bounces a child on their knee, a pastime with aeons of history. Does
that make them a sex offender? What of the child in school that falls
and hurts themselves? if the teachers stand back and do nothing, is
this in itself a form of child abuse? or do they help a child is in
distress and risk being classified as an offender that way?
|
|
So, what is abuse? Pass, no
idea, because even the "experts" have no idea, they just think they do!
And worryingly, young children seem to be being taught to think like
"experts" in all
that they do, and also see abuse everywhere. In school, from magazines
and T.V. programs our young are being
told
not to trust adults, because adults do terrible things to children,
except, of course, these so called and self proclaimed
"experts" who are doing the teaching. The result? More falsely accused
and convicted innocent parents and more "experts", the real child
abusers, getting away with it!
|